About coachrich8

My second vocation is that of a Professional Soccer Coach. I coach competitive youth soccer and specialize in skills. I am also a Certified Speed, Agility and Quickness Coach and run several programs for young athletes. I not only coach but live a very active and fit lifestyle that includes playing competitive soccer and distance running.

Attention 1v1 Trainers – is your YouTube Video Flashy or Functional? Are you teaching players to dribble too much or are you teaching them to attack?

I have been a long time technical trainer of youth soccer players.  As a trainer, a skills instructor, and as a club director and coach, I have had the opportunity to work with close to 2000 boys and girls from the ages of 3 to 18.  I have developed an affinity to teach technical skills to younger players.  I leverage a lot of methods and techniques from a popular skills training program and host one of the areas largest camps every summer.  There are tons of systems and techniques out there that essentially focus on the same things for individual skill acquisition.  I am not advocating one system over another because I use a lot of content from a few different systems. Almost every system that gets results includes ball mastery and 1v1 moves. Ball Mastery is important to get the player comfortable on the ball with every surface of both feet. Moves are important to give a player more time and space to take a shot or find the next player in the progression to pass to.

There are no shortage of coaches that are offering technical training both in their local community and on-line.  Some of the videos that I see on Instagram and youtube lately are concerning because they are less and less relevant to the game.  Sure it looks impressive to see a player getting a gazillion touches in a tight space around cones, training dummies through ladders, etc.  What is it that you are teaching? I am seeing more and more players that can demonstrate the moves but they simply don’t know how to use them because they are not being instructed properly or in a way that translates to the game.

Lets talk about the use of equipment first.  Cones are good visual cues to establish markers for boundaries or distance, they are even good as a ladder or agility course but I see a lot of over use or cones being used for the wrong intent like as an actual defender.  Agility ladders are great tools for teaching fast feet, agility, balance and coordination and can be used effectively with a ball but it should be purposeful.  Re-bounders are nice because they can make up for not having a player available to return a pass.  On their own or in combination, they can be very effective but once again, I find myself seeing video after video and I just scratch my head.  Sure, for a parent or young player, it looks impressive to see a player rapidly progressing through a pattern, around a bunch of cones, through a ladder, off a re-bounder and the rip a shot top bin, but break that down and you can see why that is cringe-worthy. People that are teaching this way are reinforcing too much time on the ball in my opinion. 

Consider Messi, Ronaldo, Neymar.  Go back a bit further and consider Ronaldinho, Pele, Maradonna, Cyuff, and Matthews.  What do you notice about them?  They are all very smooth, they use incredible moves and then explode behind or past a player, they cover a large area in a short time.  Now go back and watch these 1 on 1 training videos.  I am not trying to compare the average player in one of these clips to one of the greats but what I want you to notice is how choppy, erratic and almost spastic some of these players look. I get that as a trainer, you may be trying to demonstrate speed but to me it just looks too forced and not natural. So look again at the most skillful players, how often after a move do these great players shoot or pass the ball? Now consider some of these promotion videos, touch after touch, a prescribed pattern with lots of touches, turns, maybe a pass against a wall, bench or re-bounder followed by a shot. Looks good on the video but it does not translate to a game.

Think about how many times you see young players with great foot-skills beat a player, not advance the ball, beat the same player again and then again. It happens everywhere, sure they have great skills but they end up dribbling in the same small area and typically don’t go very far. Also consider when the player is in the box, they take on one player, two players, etc until they eventually get smashed without ever taking a shot. The next thing you know those parents are paying you to work on their shot when it has zero to do with their technique and everything to do with their decision making. Coaches, you are actually conditioning these players to hold the ball for too long. They are memorizing patterns to get repetition and by doing so are failing to recognize when to shoot or pass.

Sure, ball mastery improves first touch and builds confidence on the ball, a ladder develops quick feet and a re-bounder is useful as a training partner when there is no one around but when you put them all together and sell it as an advanced program, you are conditioning the player to a pattern, to holding the ball for too long, to try to emulate speed of play with frantic movement and removing decision making from the equation.

Consider this instead: use ball mastery as a way for the player to get a lot of touches in a short period of time as a warm-up, conditioning or homework. Have the player explode into space after making a move and shoot or pass the ball. Use a re-bounder to work in repetition and passing technique. When you are working with the player on passing activities, work on their movement into space after the pass instead of near static repetition, let that be homework. Use equipment in the right way and incorporate it for a specific area like first touch by having to regain balance as the ball is coming to their feet.

Individual training can be both technical and functional but if your training activities make for a good youtube clip because of all of equipment that you can fit in a 4×4 grid, ask yourself how that applies to the game. Teach the individual skills so that they can do them on their own and create programs to use those skills to set up a pass or a shot and apply those skills to a game like situation not for an instagram ad.

Bring on the hate!!

 

Advertisements

Competition vs Training – Winning vs Development in Youth Sports – Parent Etiquette and a Challenge!!

In 20+ years of coaching youth soccer, this has been a prevailing theme.  My talk track about the benefits of training over games in terms of time on the ball, touches and overall technical development is almost automatic especially under 12.   Every year the same or similar conversations happen with the newest crop of parents with their first born children who are new to organized club sports.  I have go-to metrics and case studies on things like how many touches a player gets during training vs. a game and how if there is a conflict between a game and a training session, that it is both more beneficial and the club’s preference to make training a priority over the game.

I have an almost equivalent auto response when asked what I thought about the game, the refs, that one player, those parents, etc.  Response is typically this is one of a gazillion games that is part of the long term process and how you (the person I am speaking with) are probably more happy/upset than than your kid that played the game, both immediatly following the game and for a longer period of time after.  Further,  I mention that I am nearly positive that this game will be long forgotten and probably close to meaningless a year from now, 5 years from now, by the end of their playing career, etc.

It doesn’t matter how much evidence or best practice guidance we seem to provide, the message is mostly lost because the parents love the games and are very serious about the competition. Parents of 7 and 8 year old players often ask why the u17 and u18 teams travel all over the country but they don’t. When does our team go to Vegas, Disney, etc? The intensity and drive for results seems to start earlier and earlier every year.

So, here is where I know that it is not just me and it is not a lack of education either.  I think that it may be generational thing because more parents than ever have played soccer.  Even if they played bad soccer with bad training and coaching conducted by their high school shop teacher, the bottom line is they now have a persective of having played the game.  The discussions of this generation are seldom “I never played soccer but…” and instead start with “well I played soccer and we never…or we always…”  The other part of this is that I am coming to realize that both the players and the parents LOVE the games and the competiton and it rarely matters what evidence you can provide to suggest that it is both a barometer of progress and intended to be fun.  So that is just fine, enjoy the games.  The problem is the intensity of the sidelines and the improper etiquette that is frequently exhibited. That intensity reveals itself in the way of coaching from the sidelines, questioning the officials, calling out players or coaches and anything else you could imagine.

If you don’t believe me that there is a concern in the sport about parent enthusiasm associated with competition and how that impacts the experience, do a quick web search on parent sideline behavior. Organizations like Proactive Coaching, Positive Sports Parenting and tons of others have made their mission to educate the fans on proper support during competitions.  Coaching Education has been created to engage the parents in the process and to help educate the parents.  Entire Leagues like the East Coast based EDP and national bodies like US Club have announced official policies for sideline behavior. State Associations like South Carolina are implementing silent sidelines.  I one had a manager proactively hand out lilipops before a rival u15 game a few years ago as a subtle reminder to our parents.

So here is my simple challenge because you never know who is watching.  We tell players all the time about the importance of effort, honoring the game and sportsmanship every time they step on the field because they never know who could be watching.  The same holds true for the spectators.  I have been in more than one college recruiting presentation where the coaches have mentioned that they often evaluate the parents as much as the players when they are scouting. So to that end, my challenge is for you to schedule a meeting with your boss sometime after your childs next game.  During the game, point the video camera on you so that when you meet with your boss, you can share and discuss that video with him or her.  Does that make you think?  Its not only for the kids benefit but for yours as well.  What if a perspective employer, business partner, customer, physician or other happen to be on the other side of the mid- line watching their child play?

Does that make you think? I hope that it does and I hope that if you are reading this, you can have a sense of humor in all of this but also realize that this is a game and it is being played by kids.  I recognize that the Development over Results conversation is becoming less and less acknowledged, so if you are going to prioritize games and competition, at least consider who are the adults and who are the kids.

In support of the beautiful game…

Twitter@coachrich8

Twitter@rfjhsoccer

Intagram@runfastjumphighsoccer

Youtubehttps://goo.gl/BjckFb

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Nasal Reconstruction Update-5 Months – Double Jaw Complications

I have been asked on my YouTube channel for updates on the progress of my Nasal Reconstruction with Rib Graft. For those following along at home I had a complication during extubation following Double Jaw Advancement Surgery to correct Sleep Apnea. The result led to a septal collapse and nasal deformity.  I was in a position to have to wait for it to heal before getting Surgery.  The update below is on my youtube channel.  Be sure to check it out, like and subcribe and feel free to ask questions.

Youth Soccer – Player Evaluations. Communication is key.

As a Club Director and Coach, I find myself and fellow coaches to be at the time of year where player feedback in the form of evaluations is needed.  Feedback and evaluation are an important part of the development process but often very difficult to get right. The balance between training/development and competition/results puts the process under scrutiny from the start and communication has a direct impact on the outcome.

We are now close to half way through the seasonal year having completed the fall outdoor training and playing season and just over 1/3 of the way through winter training.  Providing an assessment of where each player is at this stage of the year has a lot of benefits.  There are several points of view about the timing and frequency of evaluations.  For me, I have found that the mid-year is a good time because enough time has passed and each player has a amassed a solid body of work in training and games.  There are arguments both for and against more frequent evaluations and the point of this is not to infer that our approach is the right one and that others are not, it is merely a statement to set the background.

There are multiple tools and templates available that have been created and widely used by clubs at all levels. I have leveraged on line systems, checklists, MS Word and MS Excel based documents, etc.  Nearly all of the systems, programs or templates provide very similar evaluation criteria including: technical, tactical, physical, mental and social.  While it is certainly not Rocket Science, it is also not as simple it would seem. There is often a breakdown between intent and interpretation, regardless of the guidance provided to the evaluators as well as the explanations provided to the parents about the purpose and intent of the evaluations.  I have not seen a tool or system that remediates that risk.

Purpose vs Interpretation

Number system – What does it mean? What is the standard of measure? Is it a Stack Rank? These are common and obvious questions. The purpose of the numbering system is to evaluate players on a numerical scale. 1 to 5 is typical.  In some cases, coaches interpret 1-5 in relation to where that player compares to his or her teammates.  Some may consider that 1-5 is based on where they should be based on their age developmentally, while others may consider it based on where the players should be at their age compared to the standard at the regional events they participate in, like leagues, tournaments, ODP, etc.

Stack rank – Many of the systems calculate the numbers and create a hierarchical ranking for the players based on how they were scored on the various Attributes. Even though the intent is for Clubs and Coaches to keep that information for their own internal use and not share, my experience has been that many parents get to that question almost immediately upon receiving the review. Further, parents also want to ask where their player ranks in relation to the rest of the team or specific individual players.  As a coach, it is common knowledge to not talk about other players when talking about one child’s evaluation and it is best practice to refrain from comparing performance, attitude, attendance or otherwise. It is just a natural question that is influenced by our current society.

Games vs. Training- At younger ages, and in particular in under 12, everything you read as well as what most clubs do in terms of player development, is focus on individual player development, technical skill acquisition and training over games. One would think that if the ratio of training sessions two games is 2 or 3 to 1, that player evaluation systems would give more credence to training than games, yet almost every evaluation that I’ve seen or used has a much greater emphasis on game performance. So, if the message to the families is to emphasize training, what benefit does a performance or competition-based evaluation really provide?

This brings me to my next point in regards to age specific curriculum – age specific evaluation.  A lot of these systems evaluate things like vision, field awareness, decision making, as well as physical attributes like speed, power, Etc. In reality, while that is all very important, it should also be given different priority at different ages.  The evaluation systems should be based on the age of the players and what is developmentally appropriate.

So, you can see the dilemma that most coaches have as well as clubs when it comes to evaluating players. The idea and the intent are to provide the parents and the players with some feedback and guidance on how they are progressing, what they should be working on, and provide a general overview of where that player is at that snapshot in time. And while most parents are anxious and eager to see them, I have found at least, that there is so much room for interpretation, and it seems that there is a lot of concern or defensiveness, as well as an interest in the justification by the coaches, for the scores that they provided. It is often a much more tense and anxious process than most people anticipated when they sought to evaluate players in the first place.  I have learned directly and from other coaches and administrators, that like everything else, clear communication and expectations are the cornerstone of an effective evaluation cycle.

Guidance for Club Directors

Be sure to communicate the intent to the coaches, and set some clear guidelines to ensure the evaluations are approached from the perspective of developmental priorities based on their current age.  The evaluations should support your methodology and curriculum but should be influenced by best practice guidelines on a national and worldwide standard.

Guidance for Coaches

Be clear about the intent, take direction from the club. If you have more than one team at that age group, be consistent across all teams. If you employ a staff at the age group level or have team-based staff, be sure to coordinate and collaborate with the other staff to ensure that everyone is consistent with the scoring system etc.  If and when you review the evaluations with the players, focus on the positive, point out the area of focus.  Be sure to encourage the parents and players to maintain regular attendance which demonstrates commitment and to train on their own, outside of the team activities. Avoid discussing other players and refrain from answering questions about comparisons with other players. Focus on that player only.

Guidance For parents

Seek to understand the intent. Use the evaluation as a tool to capture feedback and validation. Recognize that this is about player development and the purpose is meant to drive positive outcomes. Avoid the urge to challenge the evaluation but do have a healthy discussion. Avoid the questions about other players and minimize the comparisons with other parents about their and instead focus on your child.

Overall, it is a very important part of player development and the relationship between player and coach, player and parent and coach and parents.  Communication is key. If communicated properly, executed consistently and discussed openly, player evaluations can be a very helpful tool for everyone involved.

Feel free to comment and share feedback, and good luck with player evaluations.

We need to teach our players to Honor the Game

I recently participated in a pretty elite tournament in Maryland and left the weekend more disappointed in the environment surrounding the event than the games themselves.  The way some coaches treated the officials and the way some players acted towards the referees without consequence from their coaches was baffling.  Parents routinely yelled obscenities towards the referees all weekend.  I have to say that I was happy with the way the players that I coached responded and was (mostly) happy with their parents but overall I felt like it was an ugly weekend for youth soccer.  I recorded this synopsis on the way home, it is unscripted and a bit raw but it was the essence of what I was feeling about the disappointment of the weekend.

 

US Soccer – Grassroots Rant

It has been about a month or so since the US Mens National Team failed to qualify for the World Cup.  There has been a ton of backlash about the current state of the game and about development.  What I find completely crazy is how much the current climate is being blamed on youth coaching at the grassroots level.  As someone who has been very active at this level, I will tell you that I have seen great progress over the years, not so much in the system or in the process but more so in the quality of training and the abilities of the young players.  I recorded this little Rant a couple of weeks ago after getting fed up with the dialogue about Youth Coaching.  Check it out on YouTube.

When you steal someone’s content, at least know what you are taking!

So for the past 10 years or so I have been building a brand around specialty technical training. I would like to think that I am pretty well known locally. It may be in part because of my training, but also because my son is a pretty good player and relatively well known in the local community as well. This has to be one of the all time best. Snagging a picture from my website, and posting it as their own. Here is the deal, of the 2 pictures on the front page, 1 is my son and the other, was posted with permission from his father.

Snip20171108_30

Double Jaw Advancement Surgery

I had Double Jaw Advancement Surgery in March 2017 to Correct Obstructive Sleep Apnea.  Check out the Page on my site that includes progress pictures over 3 months as well as a link to a Video Playlist on Youtube that included periodic unscripted and unedited updates of what was going on with my recovery at different intervals.  Here is a link to the playlist.

Here is the pictoral history for the first 6 months.

 

 

Do we(the experts) even realize what we are doing?

I have been around the game of soccer in the US, first as a player, then as a coach and administrator for over 40 years.  I have probably learned more and have seen the game advance more by a factor of 2 or 3 times in the last 10-12 years than in the 20 preceding years.

As part of a large club with about 40 teams that compete regionally, I have the opportunity to train, coach and watch a lot of soccer across both boys and girls from about 4 years old to 18.  I have noticed over the last 2 years that for the most part, very few teams or players for that matter, are good in the air at all.  When I look at all of the teams that I train or coach, the only players that are dangerous in the air are the players on my 2000 Boys team.  When I point out the poor air play to other coaches, I rarely get an opposing view.

This is what I think we did to ruin this part of soccer, from about 2008-2010 or so, all of the experts said that sports specialization was critical and that players needed to pick a sport.  The prevailing thought was that Soccer in the US is behind the rest of the World because the athletes are playing too many sports. The players that are about 2001 and older were 9 to 10 years old at the time but still played football, baseball, basketball etc and developed their hand eye coordination.  That ability to catch and throw also required them to understand how to track the ball, we routinely scored goals on headers from crosses and corner kicks when those same 2000/2001 players were U11, U12 etc.  To me, it seems like a large majority of players born about 2002/3 or later probably didn’t play a lot of other sports, if they did, it was likely organized, they probably didn’t play pick up football, wiffle ball, playground hoops or even throw rocks (snowballs) at each other.  I find it crazy how many kids cannot throw or catch a F’ing ball these days.

And US Soccer just took heading out of the game for 11 and under.  As a safety concern, it is a good thing, but as someone who’s focus is on player development, it could contribute to my argument.

In the last year or two, early sports specialization is suddenly bad and multi sport athletes are back in favor.  As an educator in the sport, I have a lot of go-to articles that I keep handy when I am trying to support an argument with players, parents and fellow coaches.  I recently sent a response to an article written by a highly credentialed and respected authority on youth soccer, who is a good twitter follow (I wont call him out and will protect the unknowing).  His article was about the importance of multi sports participation.  My comments included a link to an article that he wrote in 2009 supporting specialization which essentially said that US Soccer is behind because too many kids are playing too many sports.  The original article said that our young athletes are not specialized enough and are behind developmentally as a result.  So my question was really…which is it?  He did not respond by the way because I asked if this is supporting the argument that eggs are good for you, no they are bad for you, wait no, they are good for you. Perhaps if I took a less sarcastic tone, I may have elicited a response…perhaps not.

The point of all of this is that everything is seemingly coming full circle. We have coaches, trainers and administrators who are working hard to stay current and follow best practice guidelines in an effort to advance the game.  Collectively, it would seem that we are doing a pretty good job overall.  But back to my original question and title of this article. “Do we really know what we are talking about?”  It would seem that we have a generation of very good athletes who have selected soccer as their primary sport who are actually, not very good athletes when you consider that while they may be able to juggle a soccer ball 100s of times, they couldn’t juggle 3 tennis balls.  The lack of reps of throwing, catching, avoiding and tracking a ball, rock or frisbee has corresponded to players who struggle judging the flight of the ball to effectively get the ball under control or win the ball in the air.

This is not intended to be a debate about specialization vs Multi-Sport.  It is really an observation that the prevailing thoughts of the day may be causing unintended consequences in the future.  Will the current multi-sport benefits of injury prevention, cross-sport training and the creation of more rounded athlete result in better soccer players 5 years from now or will be blame multi-sports on the then current state of US Soccer? I suppose that time will only tell.  Who knows what will be said about eating eggs.

For the record,  I have no answer for why kids just don’t play outside anymore where they have fun, get tons of reps and develop all kinds of skills in the process.  Not just physical skills but organizational, leadership, conflict resolution and how to take a hit to name a few.  Another topic for another day.

Thanks for Reading.